- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-52/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 January 2013 — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0052
62013CN0052
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.4.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 123/11
(Case C-52/13)
2013/C 123/16
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint
Defendants: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Question referred
With regard to the protection to be afforded to traders, is Directive 2006/114/EC to be interpreted as referring to advertising that is misleading and at the same time based on unlawful comparison, or to two separate offences, each of which may be relevant in its own right, namely misleading advertising and unlawful comparative advertising?
Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 21).
* * *