EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 11 February 1999. # Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. # Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 92/101/EEC. # Case C-185/98.

ECLI:EU:C:1999:74

61998CC0185

February 11, 1999
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61998C0185

European Court reports 1999 Page I-03047

Opinion of the Advocate-General

1 In this case which it has referred under the second paragraph of Article 169 of the EC Treaty, the Commission of the European Communities seeks a declaration by the Court that, by failing to adopt and, in the alternative, by failing to communicate to the Commission, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/101/EEC of 23 November 1992 amending Directive 77/91/EEC on the formation of public limited-liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, (1) the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive.

2 Article 3 of that directive provides that `Member States shall adopt before 1 January 1994 the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof'.

3 The Hellenic Republic admits that Directive 92/101 has not yet been transposed into its legal system. It does, however, point out that a draft Presidential Decree adapting national legislation to the directive is in the process of being adopted.

4 Since, therefore, it cannot be disputed, and has not been disputed, that Directive 92/101 was not transposed within the period prescribed therein, the Commission's application must be considered to be well founded. (2)

Conclusion

5 I accordingly propose that the Court uphold the Commission's application and:

(1) declare that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/101/EEC of 23 November 1992 amending Directive 77/91/EEC on the formation of public limited-liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

(2) order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

(1) - OJ 1992 L 347, p. 64.

(2) - See, along these lines, in particular, Case C-410/97 Commission v Luxembourg [1998] ECR I-6813.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia