- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-13/10: Action brought on 20 January 2010 — Klaus Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0013
62010TN0013
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2010
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 80/35
(Case T-13/10)
2010/C 80/58
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Klaus Goutier (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: E.E. Happe, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Norbert Rauch (Herzogenaurach, Germany)
Form of order sought
—Annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 November 2009 (in Case R 1769/2008-4) in so far as the application for a Community mark annulling the contested decision was rejected for the following services:
—Class 35 — Tax consultancy, tax preparation, accounting, auditing, professional business consultancy, business consultancy;
—Class 36 — Fiscal assessments, mergers and acquisitions, namely financial consultancy with regard to the purchase or sale of companies and company shares, financial management;
—Class 43 — Provision of legal services, legal research;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Klaus Goutier
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘ARANTAX’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 42 (Application No 4 823 084)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Norbert Rauch
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark ‘atarax’ No 30 168 707 for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 37, 41 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and partial rejection of the Community trade mark application
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, owing to the absence of likelihood of confusion of the marks at issue
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).