- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-303/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2010 — Tresplain Investments v OHIM — Hoo Hing (Golden Elephant Brand) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community trade mark Golden Elephant Brand — Non-registered national figurative mark GOLDEN ELEPHANT — Relative ground for refusal — Reference to the national law governing the earlier mark — Common-law action for passing-off — Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Articles 8(4) and 52(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 8(4) and 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009) — New pleas in law — Article 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0303
62008TA0303
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/35
(Case T-303/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark Golden Elephant Brand - Non-registered national figurative mark GOLDEN ELEPHANT - Relative ground for refusal - Reference to the national law governing the earlier mark - Common-law action for passing-off - Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Articles 8(4) and 52(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 8(4) and 53(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009) - New pleas in law - Article 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure)
2011/C 30/62
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Tresplain Investments Ltd (Tsing Yi, Hong Kong, China) (represented by: D. McFarland, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd (Romford, Essex, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, Barrister)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2008 (Case R 889/2007-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd and Tresplain Investments Ltd.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Rejects the form of order sought by Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd for partial annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 May 2008 (Case R 889/2007-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Hoo Hing Holdings and Tresplain Investments Ltd;
3.Orders Tresplain Investments to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OHIM and one half of those incurred by Hoo Hing Holdings, and orders Hoo Hing Holdings to bear half of its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.