- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1138/23: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2024 – WS v EUIPO (Action for annulment and for damages – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB1138
62023TB1138
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7173
9.12.2024
(Case T-1138/23)
(Action for annulment and for damages - Law governing the institutions - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7173)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WS (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: E. Lekan and A. Ketels-Salet, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in the first place, the annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2023 rejecting, in particular, his request of 25 July 2023, submitted pursuant to Article 65 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39), seeking compensation for the material and non-material harm he allegedly suffered as a result of EUIPO’s conduct in his regard (‘the contested decision’), and, in the second place, an order that EUIPO pay damages of at least EUR 500 000 as compensation for that harm.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.WS shall pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7173/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—