EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-378/08: Action brought on 10 September 2008 — Portugal v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0378

62008TN0378

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/51

(Case T-378/08)

(2008/C 285/91)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by L.Inez Fernandes and J. de Oliveira, Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Principally, a declaration that the notice of payment MARKT/C2/PMS/bmgD(2008) 13692 issued by the Director-General of Directorate-General Internal Market and Services of 15 July 2008 under the heading ‘demand for payment of the periodic penalty payable by the Portuguese Republic in compliance with the judgment given in Case C-70/06 Commission v Portuguese Republic’ is invalid;

alternatively, a declaration that that notice is invalid, in so far as its effects extend beyond 29 January 2008;

an order that the Commission of the European Communities should pay the costs or, if the Court of First Instance should reduce the amount of the periodic penalty, an order that each party should bear its own costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Portuguese Republic claims that it has fully complied with the judgments of the Court of Justice by adopting Law No 67/2007 expressly repealing Decree-Law No 48051.

The Portuguese Republic further claims that the Director-General of DG Internal Market and Services had no power to adopt the contested measure, which failed to have regard to the Portuguese Republic's rights of the defence, fails to state the reasons on which it is based and was adopted in breach of essential procedural requirements.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia