- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-283/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — SH v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Third paragraph of Article 2(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Concept of ‘dependent child’ — Guardianship judgment based on the legislation of a third country concerning the protection of minors — Refusal to grant dependent child status to children under guardianship — Equal treatment — Right to education — Best interests of the child)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0283
62017TA0283
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.2.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 72/25
(Case T-283/17) (*)
((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Third paragraph of Article 2(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Guardianship judgment based on the legislation of a third country concerning the protection of minors - Refusal to grant dependent child status to children under guardianship - Equal treatment - Right to education - Best interests of the child))
(2019/C 72/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: SH (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by M. Mensi, T. S. Bohr and A.-C. Simon, and subsequently by T. S. Bohr and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and M. Windisch, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 13 July 2016 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment refused to extend the payment of the dependent child allowance to the applicant and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the decision of that institution of 3 February 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 5 October 2016.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders SH to pay the costs;
3.Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
* * *