I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-245/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Road transport - Social provisions - Exceptions - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Article 3(a) - Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 - Article 2(3) - Regular services providing for the carriage of passengers - Concept - Carriage free of charge organised by an economic operator for its employees, to and from work, in vehicles belonging to it and driven by one of its employees))
(2017/C 121/02)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: SC Casa Noastră SA
Defendants: Ministerul Transporturilor — Inspectoratul de Stat pentru Controlul în Transportul Rutier (ISCTR)
Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 and Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, must be interpreted as meaning that the service of the carriage by road of workers between home and work, organised by their employer, where the route covered does not exceed 50 km, falls within the scope of the derogation laid down in Article 3(a) of Regulation No 561/2006, according to which that regulation does not apply to such a service.
*
Language of the case: Romanian
(2017/C 121/02)
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2017:140