- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-131/19: Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Oosterbosch v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0131
62019TN0131
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.4.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/55
(Case T-131/19)
(2019/C 148/54)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Marc Oosterbosch (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that the present application is admissible and well founded;
consequently:
—annul the ‘contested decision’ comprising the payslips for the months of March, April and June 2018;
—declare, if necessary, that the decision of 6 November 2018 rejecting the complaint is annulled;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, based on infringement of the principles of legality and legal certainty and a plea of illegality: the contested decision was taken on the basis of unlawful internal rules and implementing provisions.