- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-271/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 March 2014 — Rousse Industry v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by the Republic of Bulgaria in the form of debt write-off — Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of ‘new aid’ — Duty to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CA0271
62013CA0271
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.5.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/8
(Case C-271/13 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - State aid - Aid granted by the Republic of Bulgaria in the form of debt write-off - Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of ‘new aid’ - Duty to state reasons))
2014/C 142/09
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Parties
Appellant: Rousse Industry (represented by: A Angelov and S Panov, advokati)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and D. Stefanov, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of 20 March 2013 in Case T-489/11 Rousse Industry v Commission, by which the General Court (Fourth Chamber) dismissed the action brought by Rousse Industry for the annulment in part of Commission Decision 2012/706/EU of 13 July 2011 on the State aid SA.28903 (C 12/2010) (ex N 389/2009) implemented by Bulgaria in favour of Rousse Industry (OJ 2012 L 320, p. 27) — State aid in the form of debt write-off — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Infringement of procedural rules adversely affecting the rights of the applicant — Infringement of EU law by the General Court.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal.
2.Orders Rousse Industry AD to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.