- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-532/20: Action brought on 21 August 2020 — Phi Group v EUIPO — Gruppo Cadoro (REDELLO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0532
62020TN0532
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.10.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 348/24
(Case T-532/20)
(2020/C 348/34)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Phi Group GmbH (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Campolini and L. Bidaine, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gruppo Cadoro GmbH (Eglisau, Switzerland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark REDELLO — Application for registration No 17 929 193
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 June 2020 in Case R 2677/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—find that the opposition against the trademark application fails in its entirety or, alternatively, refer the case to the EUIPO in order for it to draw all the necessary consequences from the Court’s decision;
—order the other party to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—order EUIPO and, if necessary, the intervener, to support the cost of the present proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.