I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-756/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Decision (EU) 2015/1889 on the dissolution of the Europol pension fund - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 61/48)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: AG (represented by: C. Abrar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (represented by: J. Teal and A. Ketels, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of Europol’s implied decision refusing the applicant’s complaint of 2 July 2018 against Europol’s implied refusal to adopt a reasoned decision concerning his entitlements in the provisional independent pension fund created by Article 37 of Annex 6 to the Europol Staff Regulations.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.
3.AC and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) shall each bear their own costs.
4.The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020061EN.01003802-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020061EN.01003802-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.