- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-722/21: Action brought on 11 November 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0722
62021TN0722
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 11/36
(Case T-722/21)
(2022/C 11/49)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Rosa D’Amato (Taranto, Italy), Claude Gruffat (Mulsans, France), Damien Carême (Argenteuil, France) and Benoît Biteau (Sablonceaux, France) (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
—order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-710/21, Roos and Others v Parliament.