- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-66/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Lidl v EUIPO – Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb – Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account – Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Requirements – Burden of proof)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0066
62024TA0066
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2384
28.4.2025
(Case T-66/24)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb - Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account - Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Requirements - Burden of proof)
(C/2025/2384)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG (Anzing, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, C. Zimmer and M. Hawkins, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Liquidleds Lighting Corp. (Taipei, Taiwan) (represented by: S. Beckmann, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 November 2023 (Case R 2336/2022-3).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2321, 2.4.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2384/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—