I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Plant protection products - Active substance thiram - Non-renewal of approval - Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 - Rights of the defence - Procedural irregularity - Manifest error of assessment - Competence of EFSA - Proportionality - Precautionary principle - Equal treatment)
(2022/C 128/21)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Taminco BVBA (Ghent, Belgium), Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Koleva, acting as Agent)
APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1500 of 9 October 2018 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance thiram, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing thiram, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2018 L 254, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd to bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the context of the present action;
3.Orders Taminco to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission in the context of the proceedings for interim measures.
(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.