- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-117/17: Action brought on 23 February 2017 — Proximus v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0117
62017TN0117
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.5.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 151/36
(Case T-117/17)
(2017/C 151/47)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Proximus SA/NV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Council notified to the applicant on 23 December 2016, to award the contract to another tenderer and not to the applicant;
—order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the methodology applied to evaluate the price of the offers does not allow to choose the most economically advantageous offer, which is required by European Union law.