I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
11.11.2024
(Appeal - State aid - Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers - Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concept of ‘State aid’ - State resources - Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges)
(C/2024/6608)
Language of the case: German
(Case C-790/21 P)
Appellant: Covestro Deutschland AG (represented by: D. Fouquet, T. Hartmann, M. Kachel, J. Panknin and R. Wilde, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, C. Kovács and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents, and by M. Bartsch and K. Bourazeri, Rechtsanwälte), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)
(Case C-791/21 P)
Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Covestro Deutschland AG (represented by: D. Fouquet, T. Hartmann, M. Kachel, J. Panknin and R. Wilde, Rechtsanwälte), European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, C. Kovács and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents, and by M. Bartsch and K. Bourazeri, Rechtsanwälte)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeals and the cross-appeals;
2.Orders Covestro Deutschland AG, the Federal Republic of Germany and the European Commission to bear their own costs.
—
OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6608/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—