- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-315/14: Order of the General Court of 29 October 2015 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé Nutrition (Praebiotik) (Community trade mark — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0315
62014TB0315
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.12.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 429/24
(Case T-315/14)(1)
((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 429/31)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Hipp & Co. (Sachseln, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, A. Wagner and B. Brandstätter, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Nestlé Nutrition GmbH (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany) (represented by: A. Schulz and C. Onken, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2014 (Cases R 1171/2012-4 and R 1326/2012-4) concerning revocation proceedings between Nestlé Nutrition GmbH and Hipp & Co.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.
2.Hipp & Co. and Nestlé Nutrition GmbH shall each bear their own costs and half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
(1) OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.