I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 151/43
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Swedish Match North Europe AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: H. Wistam and L. Holm, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Skruf Snus AB (Stockholm, Sweden)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 December 2013 given in Case R 1803/2012-3;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: A design for the product ‘oral snuff packages’ — registered under No 1265805-0010
Proprietor of the Community design: The other party to the proceeding
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: It was alleged that the design lacked an individual character
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested RCD
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and dismissed the application for a declaration of invalidity
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 6 CDR.