EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-620/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 23 — Restrictions to the data subject’s rights — Significant financial interest — Enforcement of civil law claims — National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law — Tax data concerning a legal entity — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0620

62019CA0620

December 10, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.2.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/8

(Case C-620/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 23 - Restrictions to the data subject’s rights - Significant financial interest - Enforcement of civil law claims - National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law - Tax data concerning a legal entity - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2021/C 44/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Defendant: D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG

Interested party: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions raised by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court, Germany) in its decision of 4 July 2019.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia