- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-275/23: Action brought on 18 May 2023 — Tinkoff Bank v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0275
62023TN0275
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.7.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/65
(Case T-275/23)
(2023/C 252/78)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Tinkoff Bank SA (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: A. Genko, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—find its application for annulment to be admissible and well-founded and therefore:
—annul Council Regulation (EU) 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 as amended on 25 February 2023 by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 (OJ L 59 I/ 278) in so far as it adds the applicant to the list of sanctioned entities under number 200;
—annul Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 as amended on 25 February 2023 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 (OJ L 59 I/ 437) in so far as it adds the applicant to the list of sanctioned entities under number 200;
—annul Council Regulation (EU) 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 as amended on 25 February 2022 by Regulation (EU) 2022/330 (OJ 51/ 1) by the addition of a new criterion making it possible to sanction ‘leading businesspersons or legal persons, entities or bodies involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation …’ in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—annul Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329 of 25 February 2022 (OJ L 50/1) by the addition of a new criterion making it possible to sanction ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation …’ in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—annul the maintaining acts in so far as they concern the applicant;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-270/23, Rosbank v Council.