- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-628/23, Axa Bank Europe and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 16 October 2023 — YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0628
62023CN0628
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/628
15.1.2024
(Case C-628/23, Axa Bank Europe and Others)
(C/2024/628)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: YG, NI
Defendants: AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt.
Questions referred
Is it consistent with the concept of ‘seller or supplier’ as defined in Article 2(c) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts to interpret that concept as meaning that:
(a)it refers only to the original contracting party that introduced the unfair contract term; or
(b)it should also be deemed to cover a new seller or supplier that has been subrogated to the contract by means of an assignment of the contract (by subjective novation) and that, although it did not introduce the unfair term, gains benefit from the financial and economic effects of the contract following subrogation to that contract; or
(c)as a result of the subjective novation, only the current seller or supplier should be understood as such, irrespective of which party occupied the position of seller or supplier as the original contracting party?
Language of the case: Hungarian
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/628/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*
Language of the case: Hungarian.