- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-389/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — KO v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0389
62020TN0389
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.8.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/45
(Case T-389/20)
(2020/C 279/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KO (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of 18 October 2019 by which PMO decided not to grant the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance, along with, if necessary, the decision of 20 March 2020 by which the defendant rejected the complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations lodged by the applicant; and
—order that the defendant pays all the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 69 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 4(1) and (2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of good administration and duty of care.