EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-250/22: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2023 — Indetec v CINEA (Action for annulment and compensation — Arbitration clause — Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) — Grant agreement — Decision categorising certain expenditure connected to a subcontract as ineligible expenditure — Obligation to state reasons — Right to sound administration — Article 202(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Action in part manifestly brought before a court which does not have jurisdiction to hear it and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0250

62022TB0250

November 27, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/959

29.1.2024

(Case T-250/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment and compensation - Arbitration clause - Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) - Grant agreement - Decision categorising certain expenditure connected to a subcontract as ineligible expenditure - Obligation to state reasons - Right to sound administration - Article 202(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Action in part manifestly brought before a court which does not have jurisdiction to hear it and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(C/2024/959)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ingeniería para el Desarrollo Tecnológico, SL (Indetec) (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: J. Navas Marqués, lawyer)

Defendant: European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo and P. Rosa Plaza, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés and A. Manzaneque Valverde, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Articles 263 and 272 TFEU, the applicant requests that the Court, first, annul the decision of the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA), contained in the letter bearing the reference Ares(2022) 1775149 of 10 March 2022, by way of which certain expenditure relating to a subcontract was categorised as ineligible expenditure; second, rule that the applicant correctly applied Article II.9.1 of the general conditions of the grant agreement to which it was party; and, third, order the European Commission to pay the applicant the amount of EUR 335 900 in performance of its contractual obligations under that agreement.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.Ingeniería para el Desarrollo Tecnológico, SL (Indetec) shall pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/959/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia