- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-638/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 15 November 2017 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0638
62017CN0638
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.2.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/16
(Case C-638/17)
(2018/C 052/22)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
Other party: ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB
Questions referred
Must Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codification) be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘cigars or cigarillos’ covers (or does not cover) cases where part of the wrapper of natural or reconstituted tobacco is additionally covered by another outer (paper) layer, as in the case at issue? Is it relevant to the answer to that question that the use of paper as an additional layer in the outer wrapper of the tobacco product (where the filter is) means that it is visually similar to a cigarette?
Language of the case: Lithuanian
* * *
(1) OJ 2011 L 176, p. 24.