EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-511/19: Action brought on 17 July 2019 – Staciwa v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0511

62019TN0511

July 17, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/35

(Case T-511/19)

(2019/C 357/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Katarzyna Staciwa (Częstochowa, Poland) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Commission’s decision of 7 November 2018 not to allocate the applicant the severance grant provided for under Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

annul the Commission’s decision of 17 April 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 21 December 2018 against the abovementioned decision;

compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered;

compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered:

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, a plea of illegality with regard to the Paymaster Office’s note of 15 December 2017.

2.Second plea in law, a further plea of illegality with regard to Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

3.Third plea in law, alleging violation of Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of equal treatment and of non-discrimination.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of legitimate expectations.

6.Sixth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia