EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-447/13 P: Appeal brought on 22 August 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2013 in Case F-143/11, Marcuccio v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0447

62013TN0447

August 22, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/5

(Case T-447/13 P)

2013/C 291/06

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:

Annul in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal;

Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2013 dismissing as manifestly inadmissible an action for (i) annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the appellant’s request of 16 August 2011 and for (ii) payment of the sum of EUR 3 316,31 in respect of part of the costs incurred for the purposes of Case F-81/09 Marcuccio v Commission.

In support of its claims, the appellant relies on the following pleas in law:

1.Absolute failure to state reasons in the order under appeal, distortion and misrepresentation of the facts.

2.Incorrect, false and unreasonable interpretation and application of:

the concept of ‘request’ within the meaning of Article 90 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

Article 91 of those regulations and illogical and unreasoned failure to have regard to the relevant case-law;

the concept of the obligation on an institution of the European Union to adopt the measures necessary for compliance with a judgment of the Courts of the European Union.

3.Absolute failure to carry out any preliminary investigations and to state reasons, and failure to rule on a claim made by the appellant in the proceedings.

4.Misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 14 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal, and consequently manifest breach of the principle of the court specified by law, referred to, inter alia, in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia