- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-369/15: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Hernández Zamora v EUIPO — Rosen Tantau (Paloma) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Paloma — Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0369
62015TA0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/34
(Case T-369/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Paloma - Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 112/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hernández Zamora, SA (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muños, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rosen Tantau KG (Uetersen, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2015 (Case R 1697/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hernández Zamora and Rosen Tantau.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hernández Zamora, SA to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.