I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Interim measures - Public procurement - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate in part - Application for an injunction - No urgency))
(2018/C 104/55)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Seco Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) Vinçotte (Vilvoorde, Belgium) (represented by: A. Delvaux and R. Simar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller and Z. Nagy, acting as Agents)
Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, first, for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the applicants’ tender in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer, and secondly, for an injunction against the Parliament.
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the application for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the tender of Seco Belgium and Vinçotte in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer.
2.The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.
3.The order of 21 December 2017, Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament (T-812/17 R), is set aside.
4.The costs are reserved.