- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-628/14: Action brought on 20 August 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0628
62014TN0628
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.10.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 361/26
(Case T-628/14)
2014/C 361/39
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Dallas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2014 given in Case R 249/2014-2.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘FORTIFY’ for goods in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No. 1 1 7 71 037
Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (2) CTMR.
* * *