I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-789/17)
(2018/C 042/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: TecAlliance GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: P. Engemann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Siemens AG (Munich, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TecDocPower’ — EU trade mark No 13 402 326
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2017 in Case R 2433/2016-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 47(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.