I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 135/27
Language of the case: Portuguese
Applicant: Agrocaramulo — Empreendimentos Agropecuários do Caramulo SA
Defendant: Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP (IFAP)
Given that the Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas, IFAP — Instituto de Financiamento de Agricultura e Pescas (Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries), IP, held that ‘only goods included in the following are eligible for export refunds:
Export refund nomenclature code 0207 12 10 9900, corresponding to what are referred to as ‘70% chickens’ which do not have completely ossified sternum tips, femurs and tibias, or
Export refund nomenclature code 0207 12 90 9190, corresponding to what are referred to as ‘65% chickens’ which do not have completely ossified sternum tips, femurs and tibias’, and that the company actually exported spent laying hens (hens slaughtered at the end of their laying period, when their skeleton is completely ossified), is the product ‘spent laying hens’ included in the description of goods ‘Others’, with the product codes ‘0207 12 10 9900’ and ‘0207 12 90 9190’, indicated in Annex I of Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87, amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2319/2002 of 13 December 2002, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2180/2003 of 5 December 2003, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2199/2004 of 10 December 2004 and by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2091/2005 of 15 December, relating to the publication, for the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, of the nomenclature of agricultural products for export refunds?’
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds (OJ 1987 L 366, p. 1).
OJ 2002 L 325, p. 35.
OJ 2003 L 335, p. 1.
OJ 2004 L 380, p. 1.
OJ 2005 L 343, p. 1.
* * *