- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-666/20: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2023 — Thunus and Others v EIB (Civil service — Staff of the EIB — Remuneration — Annual salary adjustment — Plea of illegality — Res judicata — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Staff consultation — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0666
62020TB0666
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.8.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 296/32
(Case T-666/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Staff of the EIB - Remuneration - Annual salary adjustment - Plea of illegality - Res judicata - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Staff consultation - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 296/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Vincent Thunus (Contern, Luxembourg) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, A. García Sánchez and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)
Re:
By their action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicants seek, first, annulment of the decisions of the European Investment Bank (EIB), contained in their pay slips for March 2020 and subsequent months, setting the annual adjustment of the basic salary at 0,7 % for the year 2020 and, secondly, compensation for the material damage they claim to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is rejected as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.Mr Vincent Thunus and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB).
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.