- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-222/24: Action brought on 27 April 2024 – KF v EIB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0222
62024TN0222
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3628
17.6.2024
(Case T-222/24)
(C/2024/3628)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
and consequently,
—annul the decision of the EIB of 17 January 2024 rejecting the complaint of harassment in so far as it concerns B;
—order the EIB to grant compensation for the applicant’s non-pecuniary damage, assessed at EUR 50 000;
—order the EIB to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the new Dignity at Work Policy and infringement of the powers, respectively, of the President and of the investigation panel.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the concept of harassment and errors of assessment.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3628/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—