- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-560/22, Ferriere Nord and Others: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia — Italy) — Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — National competition authorities — Imposition of a contribution to finance those authorities — Lack of connection to EU law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0560
62022CB0560
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 286/13
(Case C-560/22, (1) Ferriere Nord and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - National competition authorities - Imposition of a contribution to finance those authorities - Lack of connection to EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 286/15)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA
Respondents: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia (Regional Tax Court, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy), by decision of 30 June 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.