- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-83/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — CH v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace — Decision rejecting the request for assistance — Right to be heard — Principle of audi alteram partem — Refusal to disclose the opinion of the Advisory Committee and the minutes of the hearing of witnesses — Refusal of the defendant institution to comply with a measure of inquiry of the General Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0083
62018TA0083
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 82/55
(Case T-83/18) (*)
((Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace - Decision rejecting the request for assistance - Right to be heard - Principle of audi alteram partem - Refusal to disclose the opinion of the Advisory Committee and the minutes of the hearing of witnesses - Refusal of the defendant institution to comply with a measure of inquiry of the General Court))
(2019/C 82/65)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: CH (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 20 March 2017 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by the applicant on 22 December 2011 and, second, compensation for the loss she has allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 March 2017, by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by CH on 22 December 2011;
2.Orders the Parliament to pay CH, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 8 500;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
Language of the case: French.