Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/49

(Case T-224/23)

(2023/C 235/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: VY (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action admissible and well founded;

consequently

—annul the decision of 9 June 2022 notifying the applicant that his contract would be terminated and, in so far as necessary, the decision of 17 January 2023, notified on 23 January 2023, rejecting his complaint against the decision of 9 June 2022;

—order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the damage suffered;

—order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment with respect to the reasons relied on and infringement of the principle of proportionality.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, the right to be heard, the duty to state reasons, compliance with the requirement of impartiality of the administration and the duty of care.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.