- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-265/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — FN v Universiteit Antwerpen and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Part-time work — Directive 97/81/EC — Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC — Clause 4.1 — Principle of non-discrimination — Part-time academic staff — Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post — Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds — No requirements)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0265
62020CA0265
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 244/5
(Case C-265/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Part-time work - Directive 97/81/EC - Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC - Clause 4.1 - Principle of non-discrimination - Part-time academic staff - Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post - Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds - No requirements)
(2022/C 244/06)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: FN
Defendant: Universiteit Antwerpen, Vlaamse Autonome Hogeschool Hogere Zeevaartschool, PB, ZK, NG, ZN, UM
Operative part of the judgment
2.The Framework Agreement on part-time work, concluded on 6 June 1997, annexed to Council Directive 97/81, as amended by Directive 98/23, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not lay down any requirements for an employer hiring a part-time worker as to the method of calculating the full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds.
Language of the case: Dutch
*
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140