- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-15/16: Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0015
62016TN0015
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 90/25
(Case T-15/16)
(2016/C 090/33)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Georgios Pandalis (Glandorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Cystus’ — Community mark No 1 273 119
Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2015 in Case R 2839/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision relating to Invalidity proceedings No 8374 C and Community mark No 1 273 119 ‘Cystus’;
—order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 51(1)(a) and (2) thereof;
—Misuse of powers;
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.