I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
15.7.2024
(Case T-276/24)
(C/2024/4339)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: Vino Vintana AG (Ebikon, Switzerland) (represented by: F.-M. Orou, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Torrevento Srl (Corato, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiare – International registration designating the European Union No 1 117 515
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2024 in Case R 1483/2021-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—in the alternative, if the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4339/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—