- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-417/24: Action brought on 9 August 2024 – ET v BEI
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0417
62024TN0417
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5975
14.10.2024
(Case T-417/24)
(C/2024/5975)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ET (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul European Investment Bank’s decision of 11 January 2024 to recover part of the individual awards received by the applicant for years 2019, 2020 and 2021, i.e. EUR 37 817,23;
—annul, in so far as necessary, European Investment Bank’s decision of 16 July 2024 rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review of 6 February 2024;
—order the defendant to pay a financial compensation for the applicant’s moral harm, which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono to the sum of EUR 15 000;
—order the defendant to repay the sum recovered increased by a default interest at the European Central Bank rate plus 2 points;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 16.3 of the EIB Staff Rules.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of good administration, transparency and duty of care.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5975/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—