I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-225/09)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community three-dimensional mark Claro - Earlier Community word mark CLARO - Inadmissibility of the appeal brought before the Board of Appeal - Articles 59 and 62 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 60 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
2010/C 148/53
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Claro, SA (São Paulo, Brazil) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Telefónica SA (Madrid, Spain)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2009 (Case R 1079/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Telefónica, SA and BCP S/A
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Claro, SA to pay the costs.
OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.