- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-327/18: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 18 May 2018 — Minister for Justice and Equality v R O
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0327
62018CN0327
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-327/18)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Minister for Justice and Equality
Defendant: R O
Questions referred
Having regard to:
(a)the giving by the United Kingdom of notice under Article 50 of the TEU;
(b)the uncertainty as to the arrangements which will be put in place between the European Union and the United Kingdom to govern relations after the departure of the United Kingdom; and
(c)the consequential uncertainty as to the extent to which the respondent would, in practice, be able to enjoy rights under the Treaties, the Charter or relevant legislation, should he be surrendered to the United Kingdom and remain incarcerated after the departure of the United Kingdom,
(i)In all cases?
(ii)In some cases, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case?
(iii)In no cases?
(i)in all cases?
(ii)In some cases, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case?
(iii)In no cases?
4. If the answer to Question 3 is that set out at (ii) what are the criteria or considerations which a court in the requested Member State must assess to determine whether it is required to postpone the final decision on the execution of the European arrest warrant?