- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2008. # Carsten Brinkmann v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Word sign ‘terranus’ - Refusal of registration. # Case C-243/07 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2008:94
62007CO0243
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑243/07 P)
Appeal – Community trade mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Likelihood of confusion – Word sign ‘terranus’ – Refusal of registration
Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the evidence – Inadmissibility Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the evidence (Art. 225(1) EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 34)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 March 2007 in Case T 322/05 Brinkmann v OHIM – Terra Networks (Terranus) dismissing the action brought by the applicant for the Community word mark ‘TERRANUS’ (for goods in Class 36) for annulment of Decision R 1145/2004-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 10 June 2005, by which the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to refuse registration of the mark was dismissed in opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the Community trade mark and national figurative mark ‘TERRA’ for goods in Class 36 – Likelihood of confusion between the two marks.
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Brinkmann to pay the costs.