- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-653/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 45(1) — Promotion — Decision not to promote an official — Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0653
62020CA0653
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/5
(Case C-653/20 P) (*)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 45(1) - Promotion - Decision not to promote an official - Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Duty to state reasons)
(2023/C 35/05)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: Guillaume Vincenti (represented by: H. Tettenborn, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.