- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-625/15: Action brought on 10 November 2015 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — YTL Hotels & Properties (SPA VILLAGE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0625
62015TN0625
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 16/46
(Case T-625/15)
(2016/C 016/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: E. Cornu and E. De Gryse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: YTL Hotels & Properties Sdn Bhd (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘SPA VILLAGE’ — Application for registration No 3 841 202
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2015 in Case R 1954/2013-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.