EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 9 June 1994. # Neckermann Versand AG v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt/Main-Ost. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Hessisches Finanzgericht - Germany. # Common Customs Tariff - Tariff heading 61.08 of the Combined Nomenclature - Classification of women's or girls' knitted garments - Pyjamas. # Case C-395/93.

ECLI:EU:C:1994:243

61993CC0395

June 9, 1994
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61993C0395

European Court reports 1994 Page I-04027

Opinion of the Advocate-General

My Lords,

2. In 1988 and 1989 Neckermann imported articles of clothing which it declared as pyjamas. The defendant customs authority (Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main-Ost) decided subsequently, as a result of an auditor' s report, that the goods in question should have been classified as upper garments and trousers and, in one case, as an ensemble. Since that classification entailed the application of a higher rate of duty, the customs authority made a supplementary demand for duty. The customs authority based its view partly on the application by analogy of two Commission regulations concerning the customs classification of certain goods (Commission Regulations (EEC) No 548/89 (1) and No 812/89 (2)), which stated that certain garments could not be classified as nightdresses because they were not clearly identifiable as being intended for wearing exclusively as nightwear.

"(1) Is heading 6108 of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted to the effect that only sets of two knitted garments which, according to their outward appearance, are to be worn exclusively in bed must be considered to be pyjamas?

(2) If Question 1 is answered in the negative:

Is it sufficient, in order for garments of the type mentioned to be classified as pyjamas, for example under CN Code 6108 3190 0000, that according to the generally accepted view in trade in the Member State concerned at the time of customs clearance the goods in question may, in addition to other uses, also be worn in bed?"

"6108 Women' s or girls' slips, petticoats, briefs, panties, nightdresses, pyjamas, négligés, bathrobes, dressing gowns and similar articles, knitted or crocheted:

- Slips and petticoats:

- Briefs and panties:

- Nightdresses and pyjamas:

6108 31 ° Of cotton:

6108 31 10 ° Nightdresses

6108 31 90 ° Pyjamas

6108 32 ° Of man-made fibres:

° Of synthetic fibres:

6108 3211 ° Nightdresses

6108 3219 ° Pyjamas

6108 3290 ° Of artificial fibres

6108 3400 ° Of other textile materials".

7. As the Commission points out, the Court has consistently held that the decisive criterion for the classification of goods for customs purposes must in general be sought in their objective characteristics and properties as defined by the wording of the relevant heading of the Common Customs Tariff and the notes relating to the relevant sections or chapters thereof. (5)

10. The Commission observes that, although the Explanatory Notes of the Customs Cooperation Council do not contain any express definition of the term "pyjamas", the notes on the interpretation of the term "track suits" in heading 6112 may be applied by analogy. According to the Explanatory Notes, that heading includes:

"Track suits ... which, because of their general appearance and the nature of the fabric, are clearly meant to be worn exclusively or mainly in the pursuit of sporting activities."

The Commission observes that, if that formulation is applied by analogy, it is possible to deduce that pyjamas are garments which, because of their general appearance and the nature of the fabric, are clearly meant to be worn exclusively or mainly as nightwear.

11. According to the Commission, that definition of pyjamas is confirmed by a number of classification regulations adopted by the Commission, in particular Regulation (EEC) No 893/93, (7) where it is stated (in an annex) that certain goods cannot be classified as pyjamas because they are not "exclusively or mainly for use as nightwear".

12. Moreover, the Commission' s Nomenclature Committee (textile sector) decided, at its session on 12 and 13 October 1993, to introduce a similar definition of pyjamas into the Explanatory Notes on the Combined Nomenclature of the European Community. The note on heading 6108 now states that the heading applies to crocheted or knitted women' s or girls' pyjamas which, because of their general appearance and the nature of the fabric, are clearly meant to be worn exclusively or mainly as nightwear. The Commission states that the amendment of the Explanatory Notes has a purely declaratory function; it does not change the law, but simply clarifies the existing legal position and thus constitutes an aid to interpretation which is relevant even as regards the classification of goods imported in 1988 and 1989.

13. I am in full agreement with the Commission' s observations, as summarized above, and consider therefore that the expression "women' s or girls' ... pyjamas" in heading 6108 of the Combined Nomenclature should be interpreted as applying to garments which, because of their general appearance and the nature of the fabric, are clearly meant to be worn exclusively or mainly in bed.

14. There is one final point of general interest that is perhaps worth addressing. The national court refers in question (2) to the possibility of classifying goods on the basis of the generally accepted view in trade in the Member State of importation. That seems to imply that the classification of goods might vary depending on the point of entry into the customs territory of the Community. It is for example conceivable that a garment might, as a result of climatic and cultural differences in the Member States, be considered suitable for outdoor wear in one country but fit only for wearing in bed in another country. However, the very concept of a common customs tariff implies that goods imported into the Community should be subject to the same rate of duty regardless of the Member State of importation. Hence it is important when interpreting the tariff headings of the Combined Nomenclature to avoid using any criteria that might lead to a different classification depending on the country of importation. In the present case, for example, the suitability of a garment for wearing in bed must be assessed in the light of the habits, not of one Member State, but of the Community as a whole. Obviously it may be difficult in practice for national authorities to make such an assessment, but it is none the less worth stressing that the attempt must be made.

Conclusion

15. Accordingly, I am of the opinion that the questions referred to the Court by the Hessisches Finanzgericht should be answered as follows:

The expression "women' s or girls' ... pyjamas" in heading 6108 of the Combined Nomenclature for the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions laid down in Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 and in Annex 1 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3174/88, must be interpreted as applying to garments which, because of their general appearance and the nature of the fabric, are clearly meant to be worn exclusively or mainly in bed.

(*) Original language: English.

(1) - OJ 1989 L 60, p. 31.

(2) - OJ 1989 L 86, p. 25.

(3) - OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(4) - OJ 1988 L 298, p. 1.

(5) - See, for example, Case 145/81 Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas v Wuensche [1982] ECR 2493, paragraph 12 of the judgment.

(6) - Case C-265/89 Vismans Nederland [1990] ECR I-3411, paragraph 18 of the judgment.

(7) - OJ 1993 L 93, p. 5.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia