EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Sir Gordon Slynn delivered on 22 June 1982. # Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. # Failure to implement Directive 77/91/EEC. # Case 136/81.

ECLI:EU:C:1982:235

61981CC0136

June 22, 1982
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SIR GORDON SLYNN

My Lords,

This is an application by the Commission, pursuant to Article 169 of the EEC Treaty, for a declaration that the Republic of Italy has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty in that it has not brought into force the measures needed in order to comply with the second Council Directive on Company Law Harmonization (Directive 77/91 of 13 December 1976, OJ 1977, L 26, p. 1) within the period fixed for doing so by Article 43 of the latter. That period expired on 16 December 1978, two years after the date on which the directive was notified to the Member States.

The Republic of Italy has not denied, either in the written procedure or in its oral submissions, that it has failed to comply with the directive. It has explained that a bill, designed to enable the directive to be implemented, was presented to the seventh Parliament but it proved impossible to secure its adoption before the dissolution of that Parliament in 1979. A similar bill was presented to the eighth Parliament, on 4 or 24 September 1979 and after consideration by the appropriate Commissions was duly approved by the Senate on 16 July 1980. It is currently being considered in the Chamber of Deputies. The Italian Government has on several occasions called for a prompt conclusion of the Parliamentary process and has given an assurance that this directive will be implemented as soon as possible.

It is well established, in my view, by the cases decided by the Court that a Member State is not entitled to rely on circumstances or practices existing in its own internal system to justify failing to comply with the obligations imposed on it by a directive.

In consequence, in my opinion, the declaration sought by the Commission should be granted in this case and the Republic of Italy should be ordered to pay the costs of the action.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia