- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-147/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 28 March 2014 — Loutfi Management Propriété Intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0147
62014CN0147
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.6.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 194/12
(Case C-147/14)
2014/C 194/15
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Loutfi Management Propriété Intellectuelle SARL
Respondents: AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV
Question referred
In view of, inter alia, Articles 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must Article 9(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark be interpreted as meaning that, in the assessment of the likelihood of confusion between a Community trade mark in which an Arabic word is dominant and a sign in which a different, but visually similar, Arabic word is dominant, the difference in pronunciation and meaning between those words may, or even must, be examined and taken into account by the competent courts of the Member States, even though Arabic is not an official language of the European Union or of the Member States?
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *
(1) OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1.
(2) OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1.