I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-514/20) (*)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Postal service - Compensation for universal postal service - Professional association - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/941)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte (Colsada, Spain) (represented by: J. Piqueras Ruiz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos SA (represented by: D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero and A. Pérez Hernández, lawyers), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of European Commission Decision C (2020) 3108 final of 14 May 2020 on State aid SA.50872 (2020/NN) — Spain — Compensation to Correos on account of the universal service obligation (‘USO’), 2011-2020.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as being inadmissible;
2.Orders Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission and by the Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos, SA;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: Spanish.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/941/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)